PROTECT PATIENTS. STOP 340B CUTS!
UPDATE: On May 17, 2021, the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) sent letters to six drug manufacturers refusing 340B discounts to safety-net hospitals and providers on drugs dispensed at community pharmacies. The letters said the drug manufacturers are in violation of the law. The companies must restore 340B pricing on drugs dispensed at community pharmacies and refund providers for past overcharges.
Please read HRSA’s announcement.
Please read 340B Health’s statement.
What is 340B?
Section 340B of the U.S. Public Health Service Act provides that drug manufacturers that choose to participate in Medicare and Medicaid sell certain outpatient drugs to eligible safety-net providers at a discount. These providers then use the savings to “stretch scarce federal resources as far as possible, reaching more eligible patients and providing more comprehensive services.” Learn more about 340B.
Drug Manufacturers Are Refusing to Provide Required 340B Discounts
Eight drug manufacturers – Eli Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, United Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Merck – unilaterally have stopped providing required 340B discounts when drugs are dispensed at community pharmacies.
These actions are in violation of the 340B statute, which states that manufacturers must provide 340B pricing on any eligible drug to any eligible covered entity regardless of how the hospital intends to dispense the drug.
About 25% of 340B discounts for safety-net hospitals come through these partnerships. This figure is more than 50% for rural hospitals.
Nearly two-thirds of hospitals expect to lose 15% or more of their 340B savings due to drug manufacturer denials of required discounts.
Without access to 340B discounts, millions of patients are at risk of losing access to a wide range of services they rely on to stay healthy.
Six national organizations representing hospitals and pharmacists, along with three 340B hospitals, filed a joint lawsuit demanding prompt action to stop drug companies that are refusing to provide 340B discounts for covered drugs dispensed at community pharmacies. Read the legal complaint. A federal court on Feb. 18 granted the government’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit on procedural grounds but left the door open for the plaintiffs to refile the lawsuit in the future seeking HHS enforcement of the statute. Read our statement on the court’s decision.
News of How Drug Manufacturer Actions Harm Patient Care
- 340B Insight - Drug Company 340B Discount Refusals Harm Patients
- WIBW (Kansas) - Community HealthCare System in St. Marys to close emergency room doors, adjust services
- Morning Consult - Why Do Drugs Cost So Much?
- Chicago Tribune - Eli Lilly, other Big Pharma firms are making it harder for low-income patients to get discount drugs under federal program, doctors say
- The New York Times - Drug Makers Are Pulling Back From a Program to Help the Needy
- The Hill - Unconscionable drug company efforts threaten communities hit hardest by COVID-19
- Read a letter from six national organizations representing hospitals and pharmacists urging HHS to order six drug companies to restore 340B discounts and impose civil monetary penalties.
- HRSA letters to Eily Lilly, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Novo Nordisk, Novartis, and United Therepeutics announcing on May 17, 2021, that drug companies refusing 340B discounts to safety-net hospitals and providers on drugs dispensed at community pharmacies are in violation of the law.
- Read a letter from seven national organizations to HHS.
- Read a letter from more than 1,100 safety-net hospitals participating in 340B to HHS.
- Read a letter from a bipartisan group of 28 U.S. senators to HHS.
- Read a letter from a bipartisan group of more than half of the members of the U.S. House of Representatives to HHS.
- Read a letter from more than 60 advocacy groups for patients and social justice to HHS.
- Read a letter from a bipartisan group of 29 state attorneys general to HHS.
- Read how Eli Lilly reaped a 22% revenue increase in the fourth quarter of 2020, partially by refusing 340B discounts to safety-net hospitals.